Anitra Smith (anitra) wrote,
Anitra Smith

  • Mood:

Why is 'Bobby' the standard?

Why is 'Bobby' ( the standard for accessibility checking? I know it's not the only tool out there. But if your pages don't pass Bobby, they're unacceptable to someone who cares about accessibility. It doesn't matter that the Bobby interface is incredibly lacking in usability - to the layman (who just wants to know if the page passes or fails), it's totally unusable.

Not to mention that there are a number of bugs in the checker, and the error messages can be so obtuse that you can't figure out what's causing them!
Tags: accessibility and usability


    Today's UserFriendly is hilarious... at least to web developers :) I haven't looked into the working draft of HTML 5 yet, so I don't know what to…

  • Book essay, Barnes & Noble sale.

    An interesting essay I came upon today. Any fellow book-collector can relate to the question - "What are you going to do with all those books?" All…

  • One thing I really like about Firefox

    I really like the way Mozilla Firefox handles "ALT" text for images. Unlike IE, it does not show alt text as a "tooltip" when the image is actually…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded