Anitra Smith (anitra) wrote,
Anitra Smith
anitra

  • Mood:

Why is 'Bobby' the standard?

Why is 'Bobby' (bobby.watchfire.com) the standard for accessibility checking? I know it's not the only tool out there. But if your pages don't pass Bobby, they're unacceptable to someone who cares about accessibility. It doesn't matter that the Bobby interface is incredibly lacking in usability - to the layman (who just wants to know if the page passes or fails), it's totally unusable.

Not to mention that there are a number of bugs in the checker, and the error messages can be so obtuse that you can't figure out what's causing them!
Tags: accessibility and usability
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments